post reblogged by cis bloggers who have never reblogged a trans positivity/resource/donation/fucking anything post in their entire lives: terfs unfollow me or I’ll remove your teeth and break your legs and burn down your house uwu. am I doing this right
the scene where blue diamond calls connie stevens pet made me uncomfortable….
STEVEN UNIVERSE DID WHAT
steven universe is bad folks!
do you dumb fucks not realize that homeworld society is like, supposed to be hugely stratified by class and majorly fucked up and bad, or this detail in a show made to be understood by 8 year olds fly over your idiot heads
*walks up to a pair of dysfunctional parents* so which one of you is passively resigned to your stressful, unfulfilled life and would be much happier if you weren’t married and which one of you is the toxic destructive monster with a sad backstory
so someone just said they’re “really interested in history” how careful do you have to be?
“i just think history is interesting in general! i’m not interested in any specific part of it”: this person is most likely safe. never drop your guard though
“i’m interested in this specific subject or time period in history. (ex. ancient egypt, the golden age of piracy, the history of the printing press”: still probably safe. be on the lookout for certain risky historical subjects. you should know them you see them
“i’m really into WW2 history”: this is the caution zone, there’s plenty of valid reasons to be into WW2, but if they start talking about how Operation Sealion totally could have succeeded, it’s time to abort
“i’m specifically into roman history, the crusades, prussian military history, and WW2”: danger! do NOT talk about history with this person. in fact, do not talk to this person at all. you will regret it, you do not want to know what they think of the treaty of versailles or why germany lost the first world war
this post has inspired three different responses
1) people who lack any reading comprehension skills whatsoever and seem to think i’m saying “being into history makes you bad”
2) history students/historians saying some variation of “tbh this is true”
3) the kind of people my last point was specifying calling me slurs
what people usually mean by “makeup is an art form” is they use 11 shades to contour themselves into the same face
like i know i’m a huge nasty ogre and in the terrible event that this post got more than 20 notes someone would inevitably tell me my brows are ugly as tho that has any type of bearing but listen. makeup does so much more to promote conformity than it does to promote artistry.
i dont mean this as like “you sheep all look the same and you’re not REAL artists” i mean literally makeup tutorials and makeup that most bosses expect you to wear and contour that basically paints a new “universally attractive” bone structure over your own aren'tp particularly creative. and to protect that under the guise of “artistry” is sad and limiting and it enables multibillion dollar corporations led by men to continue to make women feel like shit and it enables our bosses to pay us less or not hire us for not performing that “artistry”
“protect heteroromantic aces” lmao from what? the sharknado?
from corrective rape? from mothers who are open and accepting of gay, bi, pan, etc people and still unknowingly tell their asexual children that people who don’t want sex are sick need help? from their closest friends at birthday parties starting conversations about how weird and fake asexuality is? from the fear of being alone forever because no one could want to be with someone like them? from going against sexual and relationship norms in a society that tells them they’re broken and wrong?? from people like you who delegitimize their struggles in the eyes of much of lgbt+ community, some of the only people who you’d think might understand?
I can’t think of a class of mothers who’d be upset that their kids aren’t fucking lmao. People might assume that you’re abnormal for not wanting sex but nobody is gonna fight you over it tf
